hmmmm

Couldn't finish the article. But he says Don James was 36-30-1 after six seasons at UW, and says Sark compares favorably AT 26-25. Problem is, it isn't true. James was 47-22 after six seasons.
 
He says if Sark wins 9 games the next 2 seasons, he will have a better record than James. I posted a correction in his comments section, but it awaits approval before being posted.
 
God, they are defending Sark like he's their child. They'll even make up stuff to do it. As our friend brents said, "Check the facts."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top