BabsGilbyTawdTy
New Fish
Eklund freely admits he was dead wrong about this staff's ability to land highly ranked classes.
Will Guzzler do the same?
Will Guzzler do the same?
Why is this even an issue? Petersen landed average classes at Boise and then coaches them up to perform at an unbelievable level.
Comes to a traditional Pac power school as a sleeping giant program, works his method and it's getting great results in only the third year.
And people doubt that recruiting won't follow? Are people that stupid? Oops...
pointing out the strength's and weaknesses of a coach is being a nega?
Why is this even an issue? Petersen landed average classes at Boise and then coaches them up to perform at an unbelievable level.
Comes to a traditional Pac power school as a sleeping giant program, works his method and it's getting great results in only the third year.
And people doubt that recruiting won't follow? Are people that stupid? Oops...
He didn't necessarily get average classes at Boise. He got the best ones in ther conference even though it's Boise, Idaho. Pete knows how to recruit and run a program. His actual game day coaching is his weak point.
Why is this even an issue? Petersen landed average classes at Boise and then coaches them up to perform at an unbelievable level.
This reminds me of the way Pete Carroll and his staff evaluates, i also think Peterman evaluates their mental make-up.Why is this even an issue? Petersen landed average classes at Boise and then coaches them up to perform at an unbelievable level.
It has got to be at least partly that. And his assistants are clearly good teachers of technique. But I also think he and his staff are really good at evaluation.
Any idiot (okay, maybe not Eklund) can identify raw athletic talent. But Petersen seems to be very good at figuring out which guys are going to be able to translate that talent into becoming superior football players. And most of that has to be about attitude and coachability. Which is where the OKG thing comes in.
OKG never meant diamond-in-the-rough, white guy, or 2-star recruit. It means guys who give a shit and want to get better. Guys who really love football and not just being recruited. And guess what, there are 4-star and even 5-star OKGs. Boise State just had no shot at landing them. Washington does.
This reminds me of the way Pete Carroll and his staff evaluates, i also think Peterman evaluates their mental make-up.Why is this even an issue? Petersen landed average classes at Boise and then coaches them up to perform at an unbelievable level.
It has got to be at least partly that. And his assistants are clearly good teachers of technique. But I also think he and his staff are really good at evaluation.
Any idiot (okay, maybe not Eklund) can identify raw athletic talent. But Petersen seems to be very good at figuring out which guys are going to be able to translate that talent into becoming superior football players. And most of that has to be about attitude and coachability. Which is where the OKG thing comes in.
OKG never meant diamond-in-the-rough, white guy, or 2-star recruit. It means guys who give a shit and want to get better. Guys who really love football and not just being recruited. And guess what, there are 4-star and even 5-star OKGs. Boise State just had no shot at landing them. Washington does.
This reminds me of the way Pete Carroll and his staff evaluates, i also think Peterman evaluates their mental make-up.Why is this even an issue? Petersen landed average classes at Boise and then coaches them up to perform at an unbelievable level.
It has got to be at least partly that. And his assistants are clearly good teachers of technique. But I also think he and his staff are really good at evaluation.
Any idiot (okay, maybe not Eklund) can identify raw athletic talent. But Petersen seems to be very good at figuring out which guys are going to be able to translate that talent into becoming superior football players. And most of that has to be about attitude and coachability. Which is where the OKG thing comes in.
OKG never meant diamond-in-the-rough, white guy, or 2-star recruit. It means guys who give a shit and want to get better. Guys who really love football and not just being recruited. And guess what, there are 4-star and even 5-star OKGs. Boise State just had no shot at landing them. Washington does.
This reminds me of the way Pete Carroll and his staff evaluates, i also think Peterman evaluates their mental make-up.Why is this even an issue? Petersen landed average classes at Boise and then coaches them up to perform at an unbelievable level.
It has got to be at least partly that. And his assistants are clearly good teachers of technique. But I also think he and his staff are really good at evaluation.
Any idiot (okay, maybe not Eklund) can identify raw athletic talent. But Petersen seems to be very good at figuring out which guys are going to be able to translate that talent into becoming superior football players. And most of that has to be about attitude and coachability. Which is where the OKG thing comes in.
OKG never meant diamond-in-the-rough, white guy, or 2-star recruit. It means guys who give a shit and want to get better. Guys who really love football and not just being recruited. And guess what, there are 4-star and even 5-star OKGs. Boise State just had no shot at landing them. Washington does.
We all pitch you shit, but this comment is spot on.
Good to see it just took one game for Roadie to be back on the nega train
As we know, you can be all airport and look like Adonis but when the wind is blowing and the rain is falling and its Wednesday practice and you hurt like hell do you love the game enough to power through?
As we know, you can be all airport and look like Adonis but when the wind is blowing and the rain is falling and its Wednesday practice and you hurt like hell do you love the game enough to power through?
huh?
![]()