FREE PUB!

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

Not a problem for me, but someone found this today:

 

[MikeDamone]

So you're trying to get us to believe that your not hanging out at the library surfing porn?

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

It's 2013. I surf porn on my phone/tablet.

 

[TheKobeStopper]

Using the library Internet. Sounds like a real winner.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

Using the library Internet. Sounds like a real winner.

Allegedly the same guy who posted that is a triple DUI guy as well.

Allegedly.

 

[TheKobeStopper]

I'd still be more embarrassed about using the library computers.

 

[RaceBannon]

I'd still be more embarrassed about using the library computers.

That's elitist

 

[BennyBeaver]

Not a problem for me, but someone found this today:

 

[DerekJohnson]

Well that's no good.

 

[TheKobeStopper]

Well that's no good.

I don't know how those porn blocker programs work but could it just be because of the word "hardcore"? I would imagine the libraries have the strictest policy possible on that.

 

[DerekJohnson]

Well that's no good.

I don't know how those porn blocker programs work but could it just be because of the word "hardcore"? I would imagine the libraries have the strictest policy possible on that.

Yes, I would think so too -- and understandably so.

 

[BennyBeaver]

Not a problem for me, but someone found this today:

Hi Hood Canal Harv!

 

[DeepSeaZ]

Does this mean we are getting a porn board?

 

[DerekJohnson]

If we had gone with "DilettanteHusky.com" or "MediocreHusky.com" we probably slip past the library sensors/censors.

 

[[Deleted User]]

If we had gone with "DilettanteHusky.com" or "MediocreHusky.com" we probably slip past the library sensors/censors.

Be a very fitting title given the current state of Husky football.

Maybe the library isn't a fan of the HHHoTW? Prudes perhaps?

 

[DeepSeaZ]

a lot of companies are now using 3rd party internet content filter that reviews sites and places them in categories. Companies can go in and choose which categories to allow and not to allow. Anyway, a site can be categorized incorrectly if the provider uses one server (IP) to host multiple sites. So if Hardcore Husky shares the same IP as Hardcore Honeys (dibs on name for site) than HH is hosed until the site moves to a different IP.

If we had gone with "DilettanteHusky.com" or "MediocreHusky.com" we probably slip past the library sensors/censors.

 

[DerekJohnson]

a lot of companies are now using 3rd party internet content filter that reviews sites and places them in categories. Companies can go in and choose which categories to allow and not to allow. Anyway, a site can be categorized incorrectly if the provider uses one server (IP) to host multiple sites. So if Hardcore Husky shares the same IP as Hardcore Honeys (dibs on name for site) than HH is hosed until the site moves to a different IP.

If we had gone with "DilettanteHusky.com" or "MediocreHusky.com" we probably slip past the library sensors/censors.

thx

 

[CFetters_Nacho_Lover]

a lot of companies are now using 3rd party internet content filter that reviews sites and places them in categories. Companies can go in and choose which categories to allow and not to allow. Anyway, a site can be categorized incorrectly if the provider uses one server (IP) to host multiple sites. So if Hardcore Husky shares the same IP as Hardcore Honeys (dibs on name for site) than HH is hosed until the site moves to a different IP.

If we had gone with "DilettanteHusky.com" or "MediocreHusky.com" we probably slip past the library sensors/censors.

Already taken.