Fleenor's Sound Logic on Why UW Must Keep Romar

bananasnblondes

bananasnblondes

Active poster
Swaye's Wigwam
1) Romar is 3-time Pac-12 Coach of the Year.
2) UW would not be able to hire another coach to replace Romar who has been 3-time coach of the year in a Power 5 conference
3) Romar must stay because UW can do no better
4) ??????????
5) Profit

Go ahead and try to punch holes in the rock solid, steel-reinforced foundation.
 
Sounds like Bleenor = KJV. It has nothing to do with results. It's all about the access.

Anyone who knows anything about basketball has seen over the past 5+ years that Romar has no clue how to coach basketball.
 
A quick rebuttal to Butler Cabin's pitch that you can only get quality coaching if you steal a coach from another power 5 conference team:

Wayne Tinkle (came from Montana)
Larry Krystkowiak (came from Montana)
Sean Miller (came from Xavier pre-Big East)

When the top 3 coaches in your league for the past season demonstrate that your argument is FS, perhaps it's time to put that argument back in your pocket and return to your habit of "predicting" things after they have already happened.
 
Here's what I don't get:

Wasn't Bleenor one of the big UW boosters who pulled his donations after willingham was kept for a 4th year?

So why is he arguing for a lifetime contract for a guy who is, at this point in time, the worst coach in the conference?
 
"Jim Owens has taken the Huskies to three Rose Bowls. Where are we gonna find another coach with those credentials? We'd be crazy to get rid of him."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top