FBI and Clinton exonerated
- Thread starter Bob_C
- Start date
http://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1658222356265852935?s=20
http://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1658215641310961679?s=20
Nothing burger. Time to move on and get over 2020. And 2016. And 2017. And 2018. 2019 was a very good year. The last year of America
http://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1658215641310961679?s=20
Nothing burger. Time to move on and get over 2020. And 2016. And 2017. And 2018. 2019 was a very good year. The last year of America
https://twitter.com/deluxe_pepe/status/1658216658886860823
I'm sure this will lead on the evening news.
I'm sure this will lead on the evening news.
Last edited:
Pitchfork51
Active poster
This is the problem with trump being such an ass
Even if people know this they are prob like eh it's for the best
Even if people know this they are prob like eh it's for the best
Well, it did show that the dazzler is lying anti-American fascist POS, but that was obvious year ago. And for some reason he says he is the one that is always right.
It's the problem with people letting them get away with it since its just Trump
Say good bye
People are morons
Just 2010
https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/protecting-outrageous-offensive-speech
To be clear: the ACLU strongly disagrees with the protestors’ message in this case. But even truly offensive speech is protected by the First Amendment. As ACLU Legal Director Steven Shapiro told NPR this morning:
“The First Amendment really was designed to protect a debate at the fringes. You don’t need the courts to protect speech that everybody agrees with, because that speech will be tolerated. You need a First Amendment to protect speech that people regard as intolerable or outrageous or offensive — because that is when the majority will wield its power to censor or suppress, and we have a First Amendment to prevent the government from doing that.
Back when REAL liberals walked the earth
https://www.aclu.org/news/free-speech/protecting-outrageous-offensive-speech
To be clear: the ACLU strongly disagrees with the protestors’ message in this case. But even truly offensive speech is protected by the First Amendment. As ACLU Legal Director Steven Shapiro told NPR this morning:
“The First Amendment really was designed to protect a debate at the fringes. You don’t need the courts to protect speech that everybody agrees with, because that speech will be tolerated. You need a First Amendment to protect speech that people regard as intolerable or outrageous or offensive — because that is when the majority will wield its power to censor or suppress, and we have a First Amendment to prevent the government from doing that.
Back when REAL liberals walked the earth
MelloDawg
New Fish
Finally, we can move on to inflation.
Also, on a related note: Oops!
https://www.salon.com/2023/05/15/ja...t-his-entire-charade-was-built-on-is-missing/
“Well, we're hopeful that we can find the informant," Comer said. "Remember, these informants are kind of in the spy business, so they don't make a habit of being seen a lot or being high profile or anything like that."
Also, on a related note: Oops!
https://www.salon.com/2023/05/15/ja...t-his-entire-charade-was-built-on-is-missing/
“Well, we're hopeful that we can find the informant," Comer said. "Remember, these informants are kind of in the spy business, so they don't make a habit of being seen a lot or being high profile or anything like that."
Last edited:
Jeezus you are a POS anti-American. To think that over your politics you would accept and ignore this kind of corruption is lower than low.
Fuck off you slime ball.
Why should the GOP move on to inflation that Biden has fed for two years?
Run and hide
