F3: Petersen is "burning bridges", "duped the fanbase", "burning down everything Sark built"

bananasnblondes

Active poster
Swaye's Wigwam
For a website that doesn't do editorials, the latest piece by the fat fuck entitled "Pete's Process Already Burning Bridges" sure seems like one.

Says, while Sarkisian built UW from an 0-12 mess to 9-4, Petersen seems to be in teh process of burning the Shiny city that Sark built to the ground.

Also, on the outlook for future games - Pete is still trying to put a blowtorch to everything accomplished in 2013 and see what remains of the char.

His main inspiration for this scathing piece seems to be Pete's choice to bench Peters after getting burned several times and throwing an embarrassing tantrum on the sidelines. F3 thinks that gassers at practice would have been a more suitable punishment.

After getting some criticism for this attack piece, F3's response was "Is this what you expected? It certainly isn't what I expected"

Of courze, the most ironic thing is that F3's boss Kim went on a tirade earlier telling everybody to calm the fuck down because we're 2-0 and things are still being worked out (at least he's consistent from last year)
 
I certainly hope Peterman is seeking out and destroying every bridge that Snark built.

would expect nothing less from a 94-12 CEO
 
For a website that doesn't do editorials, the latest piece by the fat fuck entitled "Pete's Process Already Burning Bridges" sure seems like one.

Says, while Sarkisian built UW from an 0-12 mess to 9-4, Petersen seems to be in teh process of burning the Shiny city that Sark built to the ground.

Also, on the outlook for future games - Pete is still trying to put a blowtorch to everything accomplished in 2013 and see what remains of the char.

His main inspiration for this scathing piece seems to be Pete's choice to bench Peters after getting burned several times and throwing an embarrassing tantrum on the sidelines. F3 thinks that gassers at practice would have been a more suitable punishment.

After getting some criticism for this attack piece, F3's response was "Is this what you expected? It certainly isn't what I expected"

Of courze, the most ironic thing is that F3's boss Kim went on a tirade earlier telling everybody to calm the fuck down because we're 2-0 and things are still being worked out (at least he's consistent from last year)

5-4

Shiny
 
Sounds like Fetters did his profiles in courage (on himself) write up. Should have titled it "Nachos and Ruins."

Fuck him with a napalm dildo.
 
A team that finished 6th in the conference last year. If you guys can't see how good we had it, Chris Fetters can't help you.
 
Kim is just saying that to appear balanced after Fetters already did the dirty work.
 
His main inspiration for this scathing piece seems to be Pete's choice to bench Peters after getting burned several times and throwing an embarrassing tantrum on the sidelines. F3 thinks that gassers at practice would have been a more suitable punishment.

WW7D?

After getting some criticism for this attack piece, F3's response was "Is this what you expected? It certainly isn't what I expected"

Fetters expected Petersen to stroll in, maintain perfect continuity of scheme and style, and go 14-0. Which is why he was such an vocal proponent of the new staff all offseason.

The only bridge Petersen is burning is the bridge to the web "press." Which is why these jeremiads will continue. Burn baby, burn.
 
Doogman has become a comical and pathetic parody of itself. Nail meet coffin.
 
For a website that doesn't do editorials, the latest piece by the fat fuck entitled "Pete's Process Already Burning Bridges" sure seems like one.

Says, while Sarkisian built UW from an 0-12 mess to 9-4, Petersen seems to be in teh process of burning the Shiny city that Sark built to the ground.

Also, on the outlook for future games - Pete is still trying to put a blowtorch to everything accomplished in 2013 and see what remains of the char.

His main inspiration for this scathing piece seems to be Pete's choice to bench Peters after getting burned several times and throwing an embarrassing tantrum on the sidelines. F3 thinks that gassers at practice would have been a more suitable punishment.

After getting some criticism for this attack piece, F3's response was "Is this what you expected? It certainly isn't what I expected"

Of courze, the most ironic thing is that F3's boss Kim went on a tirade earlier telling everybody to calm the fuck down because we're 2-0 and things are still being worked out (at least he's consistent from last year)

5-4

Shiny

Upvoted for giving me a Firefly CPT Mal boner.

#fuckoffImasyfynerd

 
A couple of funny things from that thread:

Fetters says "it's an op/ed piece". Once again, I thought Doogman didn't do op/eds since a Kim has said it a millions times.

Then, Fetters goes on to say that he feels great that the headline is the most controversial part of the article. Says lots of newspapers do the same to get eyes on an article. Yet those assclowns - F3 was one of the biggest offender to this - ripped Derek's book for having the words "white guilt" on the cover.

 

Paging @BiggusDickus

hurry_a94ce8_285455.gif
 
That whole bored is a dumpster fire and most of the idiots would probably trade the whole staff for Nussmier and his zero experience as a HC in a minute.
 
Looks like the UW Communication team has seen F3's piece..

The SID tweeted about it (FYI, seems like a nice guy in my limited experience interacting with him on social media).

Another reminder: "Op-Ed" means "opposite the editorial page," not "opinion/editorial." Op-eds usually by non-employee of paper/site.— jeffbechthold (@jeffbechthold) September 7, 2014
 
Back
Top