Does Peterman bench a few starters?

Vegasdawg

New Fish
I have watched the game three times now, and watched it the last time after having taken notes from what some of you had seen and posted about.

Conclusion, since Peterman inherited most of the roster, he doesn't give a flying fuck who starts, he is not emotionally driven to keep a guy on the field who is fucking up. and he has a roaster to pick and choose from. The OL sucked. Who will he bench and who will come in? Is Lindy related to the woodshed for stinking up the opportunity? If so, who starts? Is Miles still in the dog house? Does Mickens continue as a punt returner? If not, do you put Ross back there?

I doubt Peterman stands pat with his hand.
 
I'm not much good at rating OL, but if I'm in charge it will take a miracle for Atoe to play himself back into the starting lineup let alone the 1st round of the draft.
 
How about benching a few coaches? Kawasaki, Strausser, and Smith.

Fuck Sark, but in one game I'm already questioning defensive coaching, and missing Wilcox. Kawasaki's bend-but-don't-break bullshit has me waking up in a cold sweat after a nightmare featuring nick holt.

Peterman better out a stop to this shit right now.
 
How about benching a few coaches? Kawasaki, Strausser, and Smith.

Fuck Sark, but in one game I'm already... missing Wilcox. Kawasaki's bend-but-don't-break bullshit has me waking up in a cold sweat after a nightmare featuring nick holt.

Peterman better out a stop to this shit right now.

DGD
 
Last edited:
How about benching a few coaches? Kawasaki, Strausser, and Smith.

Fuck Sark, but in one game I'm already questioning defensive coaching, and missing Wilcox. Kawasaki's bend-but-don't-break bullshit has me waking up in a cold sweat after a nightmare featuring nick holt.

Peterman better out a stop to this shit right now.
Kawasaki? is this some running joke here I've missed?
 
I was actually fine with playing off of the receivers for the first game. Peters should be able to do whatever you need him to do, but you'd rather the opposing offense drive the length of the field off of short/medium gains than completely burn a brand new db and shatter his confidence. We obviously won't be able to protect them from here on out though.
 
The "Wilcox is the greatest" has got to stop. UW replaces 3/4 in the secondary and QB, hence my tempered expectations. Even though this secondary has great natural talent, they need experience. You do not run press coverage all over the field with 1 over the top in the first game with this experience. If you can't see that I can't help you. LIFPO
 
Last edited:
I said it in the game thread, but if Jermaine Kelly isn't playing off his guy he is going to get beat over the top every time. He is very bad right now.
 
I have watched the game three times now, and watched it the last time after having taken notes from what some of you had seen and posted about.

Conclusion, since Peterman inherited most of the roster, he doesn't give a flying fuck who starts, he is not emotionally driven to keep a guy on the field who is fucking up. and he has a roaster to pick and choose from. The OL sucked. Who will he bench and who will come in? Is Lindy related to the woodshed for stinking up the opportunity? If so, who starts? Is Miles still in the dog house? Does Mickens continue as a punt returner? If not, do you put Ross back there?

I doubt Peterman stands pat with his hand.

LEAVE!
 
Why the fuck are you watching the game 3 times?

I think, no I know, I would light myself on fire if I sat thru that on three separate occasions. Fuck, I was considering substituting drano for my whiskey watching it live.
 
ed the game three times now, and watched it the last time after having taken notes from what some of you had seen and posted about.

Conclusion, since Peterman inherited most of the roster, he doesn't give a flying fuck who starts, he is not emotionally driven to keep a guy on the field who is fucking up. and he has a roaster to pick and choose from. The OL sucked. Who will he bench and who will come in? Is Lindy related to the woodshed for stinking up the opportunity? If so, who starts? Is Miles still in the dog house? Does Mickens continue as a punt returner? If not, do you put Ross back there?

I doubt Peterman stands pat with his hand.[/QUOTE]

Thumb up
 
How about benching a few coaches? Kawasaki, Strausser, and Smith.

Fuck Sark, but in one game I'm already questioning defensive coaching, and missing Wilcox. Kawasaki's bend-but-don't-break bullshit has me waking up in a cold sweat after a nightmare featuring nick holt.

Peterman better out a stop to this shit right now.

Passion your bullshit might fly at fatman but not here. Ill call you on every buttfucked thing u say about push and heat. Its old and youre not blamin g coaches after one game bungus.

Rail on the coaches with a fair sample size. In the meantime u can receive a sturdy push from the middle right up your penny from purple and heat down your throat from kimmy.
 
How about benching a few coaches? Kawasaki, Strausser, and Smith.

Fuck Sark, but in one game I'm already questioning defensive coaching, and missing Wilcox. Kawasaki's bend-but-don't-break bullshit has me waking up in a cold sweat after a nightmare featuring nick holt.

Peterman better out a stop to this shit right now.

Passion your bullshit might fly at fatman but not here. Ill call you on every buttfucked thing u say about push and heat. Its old and youre not blamin g coaches after one game bungus.

Rail on the coaches with a fair sample size. In the meantime u can receive a sturdy push from the middle right up your penny from purple and heat down your throat from kimmy.

I made water. In my pants.
 
The "Wilcox is the greatest" has got to stop. UW replaces 3/4 in the secondary and QB, hence my tempered expectations. Even though this secondary has great natural talent, they need experience. You do not run press coverage all over the field with 1 over the top in the first game with this experience. If you can't see that I can't help you. LIFPO

Wilcox inherited experienced DBs, but he also inherited some inexperienced DLs and LBs. You forgot to mention (or research) that.

I don't think "Wilcox is the greatest," but to dismiss his positive impact on the defense is FS. Our guys were flying around and making plays, whereas under holt they were passive and lost, and content to bend but not break. Which is exactly how they looked much of Saturday.

 
The "Wilcox is the greatest" has got to stop. UW replaces 3/4 in the secondary and QB, hence my tempered expectations. Even though this secondary has great natural talent, they need experience. You do not run press coverage all over the field with 1 over the top in the first game with this experience. If you can't see that I can't help you. LIFPO

Wilcox inherited experienced DBs, but he also inherited some inexperienced DLs and LBs. You forgot to mention (or research) that.

I don't think "Wilcox is the greatest," but to dismiss his positive impact on the defense is FS. Our guys were flying around and making plays, whereas under holt they were passive and lost, and content to bend but not break. Which is exactly how they looked much of Saturday.
Hi there.

UW's defense gave up 16 points on Saturday. Wilcox's defenses held opponents under 21 twice on the road in 11 tries.

 
Back
Top