MikeDamone
Active poster
When did a legal block that is relevant to the play, in front, above the waist, not helmet to helmet become unecessary roughness? Jesus that call was maybe the worst of the year.
DJ, Race, PLSS a Q..
- Thread starter MikeDamone
- Start date
the refs were just doing their jobs... just like the prison guards at Auschwitz
(Okay, maybe a ridiculous exaggeration, but still...)
(Okay, maybe a ridiculous exaggeration, but still...)
TierbsHsotBoobs
New Fish
That was the one fuckup I saw from the officials all night.
PF call on Daniels was an absolute joke. They punted that series though IIRC.
Hands to the face on #8 early was a joke but I'm pretty sure they ended up punting that series anyways.
Holding call on the 4th and inches, first Husky series, also a joke. That one stung.
Stanford OL got away with some of the most flagrant, non-called holds I've ever seen in the first half. I know this goes on all the time but a couple were on the perimeter where everyone could see them. Again, they didn't score on those possessions.
Of all the blatantly bad calls or non-calls, only the phantom holding on that early Husky possession may have affected the outcome.
TierbsHsotBoobs
New Fish
The hands to the face call was on #80, not #8. It was a clear foul.
The hold was a tackle by Charles at the point of attack. Again, a clear foul.
The holds I saw against Stanford early were away from the play. Those should generally be ignored.
[/QUOTE]
The hands to the face call was on #80, not #8. It was a clear foul.
The hold was a tackle by Charles at the point of attack. Again, a clear foul.
The holds I saw against Stanford early were away from the play. Those should generally be ignored.[/QUOTE]
That's right. I forgot about that explanation.
Totally disagree on the hold on Charles. Bang bang play, 4th and inches, a cheap hold that had no affect.
I don't see holding unless it's directly affecting the play since I tend to watch the ball carrier and whomever is chasing him. The two worst Stanford holds I saw were, 1) a tackle from behind by a guard on a run that went right through his hole, and 2) a prolonged shirt grab by the right tackle or TE, not sure, on a run around the right end.
The hands to the face call was on #80, not #8. It was a clear foul.
The hold was a tackle by Charles at the point of attack. Again, a clear foul.
The holds I saw against Stanford early were away from the play. Those should generally be ignored.[/QUOTE]
That's right. I forgot about that explanation.
Totally disagree on the hold on Charles. Bang bang play, 4th and inches, a cheap hold that had no affect.
I don't see holding unless it's directly affecting the play since I tend to watch the ball carrier and whomever is chasing him. The two worst Stanford holds I saw were, 1) a tackle from behind by a guard on a run that went right through his hole, and 2) a prolonged shirt grab by the right tackle or TE, not sure, on a run around the right end.
TierbsHsotBoobs
New Fish
The hold by Charles prevented the Stanford LB from making a tackle for a loss. On fourth down, that's a pretty big deal.
D
[Deleted User]
Guest
Fixed.
LOL. Good one.
I wonder if Kim is secretly planning a Final Solution?
MikeDamone
Active poster
What was the rule? Blocking too hard is illegal?
TierbsHsotBoobs
New Fish
It's only illegal if you commit a targeting foul on a blind-side block. Since it wasn't called targeting, it should not have been a foul at all.
D
[Deleted User]
Guest
Football in general has become a soft pussy game.
Within 20 years this game will be two hand touch.
Within 20 years this game will be two hand touch.
Pac-12 football is soft, the SEC is still enjoying knocking people the fuck out
D
[Deleted User]
Guest
Football as a whole is soft. The NFL, college football is all soft. Only the SEC is old school.
puppylove_sugarsteel
New Fish
Refs are job-scared. Don't wanna join soup line with Kitty and co! Serious, and its a problem. The "defenseless "player was about to tackle return man. Starting to dislike college football.