DerekJohnson stumbled onto an interesting topic

RaccoonHarry

RaccoonHarry

New Fish
with his prediction of a 2013 Honorable Mention for Mickens. So interesting I thought it worthy of a separate topic/question.

Namely, what other Huskies are legitimate candidates for vaunted Honorable Mention status in 2013? I think Price is a lock - anybody else?
 
Sankey for sure.

KW, Parker, Shaq, Shelton have a good shot

ASJ is first team lock unless he fucks up again
 
Sankey for sure.

KW, Parker, Shaq, Shelton have a good shot

ASJ is first team lock unless he fucks up again
Click to expand...
Not the case. Matmik hath declared that Colt Lyeria is better. Rob Gronkowski 2.0. "#advancedstats"

 
With the amount of coke that Lyerla puts down....I always thought he was better suited for defense.
 
1st Team- ASJ, Sean Parker
2nd Team- Bishop Sankey, Shaq, Shirley (I think he gets 10 sacks)

Honorable Mention- Shelton, KW, Feeney, Peters

Have a shot- Price, Timu
 
Last edited:
Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...
 
Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...
Click to expand...

I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
 
Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...
Click to expand...

I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
Click to expand...

Agree, 7-5 sounds about right. Sark would be a decent coach at a Big Sky level school but not in the Pac-12. Of course if 7-5 is seen as real improvement he buys himself at least another year.
 
Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...
Click to expand...

I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
Click to expand...

Agree, 7-5 sounds about right. Sark would be a decent coach at a Big Sky level school but not in the Pac-12. Of course if 7-5 is seen as real improvement he buys himself at least another year.
Click to expand...

7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6
 
Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...
Click to expand...

I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
Click to expand...

Agree, 7-5 sounds about right. Sark would be a decent coach at a Big Sky level school but not in the Pac-12. Of course if 7-5 is seen as real improvement he buys himself at least another year.
Click to expand...

7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6
Click to expand...

This incremental progress pleases Scott Woodward.
 
Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...
Click to expand...

I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
Click to expand...

Agree, 7-5 sounds about right. Sark would be a decent coach at a Big Sky level school but not in the Pac-12. Of course if 7-5 is seen as real improvement he buys himself at least another year.
Click to expand...

7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6
Click to expand...
We're back bitches!!!

 
Wow, I was just axing for Honorable Mentions. It seems there are Huskies with a shot at 1st or 2nd Team! Maybe 2013 really WILL turn out to be special...
Click to expand...

I know you are being sarcastic, but we do have some good players. The problem is we also have a lot of flaws. Bad OL, average QB, poor depth at DT, weak pass rush, potential problems at FS and CB, pretty bad special teams. Not to mention the real reason we will be mediocre.... Our head coach. So while I do think we will have a couple of guys on the 1st and 2nd team, we will still end up 7-5.
Click to expand...

Agree, 7-5 sounds about right. Sark would be a decent coach at a Big Sky level school but not in the Pac-12. Of course if 7-5 is seen as real improvement he buys himself at least another year.
Click to expand...

7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6 > 7-6
Click to expand...

Four new entries into Sarkisian's Championship Website Gallery
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top