Curious post made on Husky Nation page on Facebook

DerekJohnson

Administrator
Staff member
Swaye's Wigwam
Founder's Club
A troll or a sincere poster?

---

Eldon Hammer
5 hrs
For everyone talking about UW and Petersen not winning any big games. We’ve had plenty of big wins. But expecting us to go toe to toe with those schools just a few years after going 0-12 isn’t realistic. We’re making strides, big ones. But Washington is t ready to contend with Bama, OSU and the elites. But we’ll get there.

Here’s who Petersen has beat since arriving at Washington

#19 Boise state
#14 Arizona
#14 Arizona State
#12 Utah
#20 WSU
#7 Stanford
#11 Utah
#23 WSU
#8 Colorado
#21 Utah
#12 WSU
#20 BYU
#8 WSU
#18 Utah

Under Petersen they’ve lost to
#8 Auburn
#6 Ohio State
#8 Penn State
#20 USC
#1 Alabama
#8 Oregon (Petersen’s first year)
#11 Stanford
 
When the fuck did we beat Boise State with Pete as our coach? And almost half of those rankings are made up.

I don't know why I'm even replying to this.
 
Where do the losses last year to Cal and a year earlier to Todd Graham’s ASU squad rank?
 
Last edited:
A troll or a sincere poster?

---

Eldon Hammer
5 hrs
For everyone talking about UW and Petersen not winning any big games. We’ve had plenty of big wins. But expecting us to go toe to toe with those schools just a few years after going 0-12 isn’t realistic. We’re making strides, big ones. But Washington is t ready to contend with Bama, OSU and the elites. But we’ll get there.

Here’s who Petersen has beat since arriving at Washington

#19 Boise state
#14 Arizona
#14 Arizona State
#12 Utah
#20 WSU
#7 Stanford
#11 Utah
#23 WSU
#8 Colorado
#21 Utah
#12 WSU
#20 BYU
#8 WSU
#18 Utah

Under Petersen they’ve lost to
#8 Auburn
#6 Ohio State
#8 Penn State
#20 USC
#1 Alabama
#8 Oregon (Petersen’s first year)
#11 Stanford

Troll or sincere (but moronic).

Go to ESPN. Look at UW's performance vs ranked teams for the past 5 years. Peterman is an underwhelming 10-14 against ranked teams. The wins came against WSU (4); Utah (2); BYU (1); Colorado (1); Stanford (1) and USC (1).

Two wins against decent ranked teams in 5 years. You can name who the fuck ever you want as the two decent wins. I won't argue because the rest aren't decent.
 
Always wondered what Kim Grinolds Facebook profile was. Should have known. Guys with microdicks always use Hammer for their fake profile names.
 
Can expect to win big games after going 0-12 over a decade ago.

It was under a decade ago when we lost. But now that the decade has passed it is smooth sailing. 45-0 the next three years, here we come.
 
A troll or a sincere poster?

---

Eldon Hammer
5 hrs
For everyone talking about UW and Petersen not winning any big games. We’ve had plenty of big wins. But expecting us to go toe to toe with those schools just a few years after going 0-12 isn’t realistic. We’re making strides, big ones. But Washington is t ready to contend with Bama, OSU and the elites. But we’ll get there.

Here’s who Petersen has beat since arriving at Washington

#19 Boise state
#14 Arizona
#14 Arizona State
#12 Utah
#20 WSU
#7 Stanford
#11 Utah
#23 WSU
#8 Colorado
#21 Utah
#12 WSU
#20 BYU
#8 WSU
#18 Utah

Under Petersen they’ve lost to
#8 Auburn
#6 Ohio State
#8 Penn State
#20 USC
#1 Alabama
#8 Oregon (Petersen’s first year)
#11 Stanford

Troll or sincere (but moronic).

Go to ESPN. Look at UW's performance vs ranked teams for the past 5 years. Peterman is an underwhelming 10-14 against ranked teams. The wins came against WSU (4); Utah (2); BYU (1); Colorado (1); Stanford (1) and USC (1).

Two wins against decent ranked teams in 5 years. You can name who the fuck ever you want as the two decent wins. I won't argue because the rest aren't decent.

Why is the loss against Oregon last year not listed?
 
The pit of 0-12 continues to deepen as the years progress... Watching a legitimate reason for failure gradually turn in to a security blanket excuse is never pretty. Some never wanted 0-12; some won't give it up.
 
The win over Stanford was the only one that I've thought was big time

The foster farms 7-5 cardinal led by a backup qb. Bigtime win. That win was the equivalent of LSU beating Mississippi state in September when the bulldogs are 3-0 and #6, before finishing 6-6 and going to the liberty bowl
 
The win over Stanford was the only one that I've thought was big time

The foster farms 7-5 cardinal led by a backup qb. Bigtime win. That win was the equivalent of LSU beating Mississippi state in September when the bulldogs are 3-0 and #6, before finishing 6-6 and going to the liberty bowl

It felt big time at the moment.

By the same measure, it's like saying Sarks win over Pete Carroll wasn't big time. But it was.
 
A troll or a sincere poster?

---

Eldon Hammer
5 hrs
For everyone talking about UW and Petersen not winning any big games. We’ve had plenty of big wins. But expecting us to go toe to toe with those schools just a few years after going 0-12 isn’t realistic. We’re making strides, big ones. But Washington is t ready to contend with Bama, OSU and the elites. But we’ll get there.

Here’s who Petersen has beat since arriving at Washington

#19 Boise state
#14 Arizona
#14 Arizona State
#12 Utah
#20 WSU
#7 Stanford
#11 Utah
#23 WSU
#8 Colorado
#21 Utah
#12 WSU
#20 BYU
#8 WSU
#18 Utah

Under Petersen they’ve lost to
#8 Auburn
#6 Ohio State
#8 Penn State
#20 USC
#1 Alabama
#8 Oregon (Petersen’s first year)
#11 Stanford

Troll or sincere (but moronic).

Go to ESPN. Look at UW's performance vs ranked teams for the past 5 years. Peterman is an underwhelming 10-14 against ranked teams. The wins came against WSU (4); Utah (2); BYU (1); Colorado (1); Stanford (1) and USC (1).

Two wins against decent ranked teams in 5 years. You can name who the fuck ever you want as the two decent wins. I won't argue because the rest aren't decent.

Why is the loss against Oregon last year not listed?

Did you get a refund for your Rose Bowl charter bus ticket?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top