Countdown to Kimberly calling everyone miserable and saying a win is a win....

Last year, UW folds and loses that game. I will give them credit for that. They still looked sloppy and undisciplined, but they didn't fold.
 
He has brainwashed enough morons over there to do that for him. The big discussion on dawgman right now is whether it should be "allowed" for people to be critical of the team after a win
 
Whos Kim????

Kim Grinolds - strait outta Renton.

Selling split-levels and tri-levels like its going outta style. Part time.

Warshington footballer, full time.
 
I'm sure if they weren't tweeting at 1 a.m. they would have won by 35.
Click to expand...

ASJ did look like shit though.......
Click to expand...

Not going to disagree, but how often did Sark put him in position to not look like shit? Dude is 7 foot 8 and weighs 460 pounds, and he's throwing him the ball to the sidelines? That takes a special kind of dumbass playcaller.
 
I'm sure if they weren't tweeting at 1 a.m. they would have won by 35.
Click to expand...

ASJ did look like shit though.......
Click to expand...

Not going to disagree, but how often did Sark put him in position to not look like shit? Dude is 7 foot 8 and weighs 460 pounds, and he's throwing him the ball to the sidelines? That takes a special kind of dumbass playcaller.
Click to expand...

He wasn't a factor at all and only time you heard his name was for a dumb penalty.
 
On defense we looked fundamentally sound but not spectacular. On offense, we look like we have purpose and an identity. I loved the willingness to run the ball at key times for the most part. Price has improved in confidence and performance.

Against the upper echelon this team will lose most games.

So... A road win is a solid win. This team so far looks better than last year and seems destined for 8-5 and maybe 9-4.
 
He has brainwashed enough morons over there to do that for him. The big discussion on dawgman right now is whether it should be "allowed" for people to be critical of the team after a win
Click to expand...

I wonder if the coaching staff is "allowed" to be critical after a game, win or lose?

"Critical" as in objectively looking at outcomes & individual player performance to seek improvements to the team.

Asking questions. . .you know, actually fucking thinking about what worked and what didn't.

I'm sure that never happens.

Doogs gotta doog.

Fuck.

 
Last edited:
Sark is attempting to reach Belloti status. Use offense to win the games you should after blowing the lead and upsetting better teams on occasion. 8-4 average with a BCS bowls once a decade
 
Sark is attempting to reach Belloti status. Use offense to win the games you should after blowing the lead and upsetting better teams on occasion. 8-4 average with a BCS bowls once a decade
Click to expand...

Belloti is probably a good comparison. That is the high water mark for Sark. Sadly, if Sark gets us the decade Belotti had, Doogs will anoint him. Oregon, who is serious about football allegedly, jettisoned him for a REALLY good Coach, not just a serviceable one.
 
Sark is attempting to reach Belloti status. Use offense to win the games you should after blowing the lead and upsetting better teams on occasion. 8-4 average with a BCS bowls once a decade
Click to expand...

Belloti is probably a good comparison. That is the high water mark for Sark. Sadly, if Sark gets us the decade Belotti had, Doogs will anoint him. Oregon, who is serious about football allegedly, jettisoned him for a REALLY good Coach, not just a serviceable one.
Click to expand...

Sark needs to keep up with Chan Gailey first. He's nowhere near Bellotti yet.
 
On defense we looked fundamentally sound but not spectacular. On offense, we look like we have purpose and an identity. I loved the willingness to run the ball at key times for the most part. Price has improved in confidence and performance.

Against the upper echelon this team will lose most games.

So... A road win is a solid win. This team so far looks better than last year and seems destined for 8-5 and maybe 9-4.
Click to expand...

Correct and considering how young UCLA is makes me hate Sark all the more...We have never improved game 1 to 2. Just don't understand Sarky. But I said Illini no gimme, but that's just because I knew we'd be sloppy and the playcalling terrible (until 2nd half, then beyond.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top