COLLEGEDOOG!! TRUE?!?

[oregonblitzkrieg]

Learn how to think its catching on

China is fucking up their air, we cleaned ours.

But they are FAR more serious

What a moron

Middlebury, my company is doing a fair of amount of export biz with the Chineeze (btw, total pain in the ass. they are a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act nightmare. I feel like we need legal counsel to follow the guys around over there. At every fucking turn there's an issue, and the business guys wind up spending as much time on the phone with me (for pretend) as they do with their business counterparts.

anyway, feedback I get from them is that it's a very dirty place. air quality is an oxymoron there.

I would never trust the Chineeze.

I don't trust them but they shouldn't be a deterrent or an excuse for inaction.

The Chinese NOGAF and never will. Period. Hint - China is a communist country. Communist countries don't usually care about pollution/global warming, they care about 5 year plans to turn their economies into steamrollers regardless of the cost to the planet or to their proletariat.

 

[unfrozencaveman]

Collegedoog - you seem like a nice young chap, but you need to stop setting yourself on fire

You're gonna end up like this guy

 

[MikeDamone]

It's what you climate skeptics do. Attack the people not the data because you can't. You keep stepping in your own shit every time you post.

The worlds most un self aware man needs a fucking mirror

You misspelled climate true believers

MURDOCH!!!!!!11111!!!

Shit you're a cliche

If Murdoch's papers reported anything accurately they would be taken seriously. They've proven to be unable to.

It's amazing how brilliant you are in other areas, but severely lacking in this one.

They don't report anything accurately? Seriously? Did MSNBC tell you that?

Dude you sound fucking stupid.

Serious pressing.

You don't understand the meaning of pressing. Clearly.

 

[HoustonHusky]

Murdoch...Koch...burn....

This is your response? You ignore what your boy Hansen said which was the same, you ignore other published papers that say the same thing ("Overestimated global warming over the past 20 years" by Fyfe et. al, 2012), and because some newspaper is owned by Murdoch then everything on the subject and all quotes are now wrong. Maybe Murdoch paid some of Hansen's $1.6 million in unreported income for him to say it...is this part of your nutjob conspiracy? (Helpful hint...its why the recent focus of the global warming crowd is now on oceans...if you can't find warming in the global temps you have to go find it somewhere).

And yes, through it all you are still missing the simple point...not only is global warming statistically zero for the last 17 (or pick your number) years, the slope of those years is statistically different than the slope of the previous 20+ years (feel free to do the statistical test yourself...but I'm sure that is not in your "wheelhouse") and even more importantly any direct causation relationship between CO2 and temperatures for all of the previous data absolutely falls apart for the last 17 years, which is why temps are now outside of the 95% predictions of all of the climate models (another elementary point too difficult for you to comprehend).

But hey...you are the "smart" one around here...at least you keep telling us...keep plugging away...you are already in a huge hole you have dug for yourself...in your defense though you have gotten one word right so far..."promote".

 

[Kaepsknee]

CollegeDoog finally got one thing corrrect..."promote". These are not unbiased scientists analyzing data using the scientific method...these are advocates promoting a view using any and all means, including selective data, hiding analysis, and even more unethical means (Gleick). And idiots like CollegeDoog lap it up without even blinking (or thinking).

I'll try and keep it simple...you are taking blog posts from a guy who's admitted having huge ethical lapses to promote his position to say you have (cherry-picked) data that proves reality wrong...even the head of the IPCC Climate disagrees:

THE UN's climate change chief, Rajendra Pachauri, has acknowledged a 17-year pause in global temperature rises

and even your boy Hansen says you are wrong (from his paper published in 2012)
"The five-year mean global temperature has been flat for the last decade, which we interpret as a combination of natural variability and a slow down in the growth rate of net climate forcing." (Global Temperature Update Through 2012.)

You ignored the discussion on the climate models...maybe you are finally accepting those are wrong too? (True saying...all models are wrong, some models are useful. Unfortunately these haven't reached that level yet).

And yes, now 97% of the scientist have read, reviewed, and analyzed all of the climate data and agree. You are even dumber than you type.

Uh. No. I followed your link. It's from a Rupert Murdoch owned paper. That should have been your first red flag. The only quote she provides says that warming has not risen at the same rate. Red flag number 2. She never says that it has paused, or that it is even statistically significant, which it isn't. Fail.

This slower growth has been attributed to more frequent La Nina events in the 2000s, even though the "plateau" has been at record levels and in no way disproves global warming.

Also, do I have to tell you why the no warming since '97/'98 line is so bullshit? It was a fucking hot year due to an El Nino event and is a huge outlier on the overall trend. No fucking retard draws a line starting at the top of the '97 bar flat across and claims that accurately reflects the graph. That is what you are doing. It's hilarious. La Nina/El Nino is also the natural variability in temperatures. You can see 3 of the last 5 years have been La Nina so any unbiased observer would tell you that insinuating that shows that temp increases have stopped is FS. The La Nina temps are also increasing and at record levels for 2012. That should also tip you off but you've already shown piss poor graph interpreting skills.

And I'm not working off those scientists. I'm working off data provided by NASA, NOAA, etc. One activist doesn't discredit this data.

It's what you climate skeptics do. Attack the people not the data because you can't. You keep stepping in your own shit every time you post.

Did you need to type 700 words to say it was La Nina and El Nino.

The whole global warming industry took off as soon as the phenomena of El Nino was discovered. The alarmist seized upon this occurrence to claim that this was somehow a new thing and was caused by human Co2. As if this never had occurred before and they had invented it. It quickly exploded into a more than cottage industry.

Then when the phenomena aka as La Nina was discovered they said that was why the cooling periods were occurring. But at least they evolved enough to not act as if they had invented that too.

 

[Swaye]

Does Voodoo Economics have a play in any of this?