Chicago Chicago-

[georgiaduck]

Good thing Chicago doesn't have a history of corrupt elections. Otherwise, this might get traction.
On March 19, polling day, Harris was nearly 10,000 votes behind, according to an early estimated tally. By the end of Wednesday, after the 10,000 votes were added in, unofficial results had narrowed down to a tiny margin. O'Neill Burke was ahead by just 1,598 votes, with 50.16 percent of the poll, against 49.84 percent for Harris.

Democrat candidates get 10,000 missing votes after "human error"

 

[Swaye]

Finding 10K votes all for the same person is totally normal. Stop being a MAGAtard!

 

[georgiaduck]

I heard about this guy who made a phone call saying he just needed a little more than 11,000 votes and now he's on trial! Even though he never got those votes!

 

[Bob_C]

I heard about this guy who made a phone call say he just needed a little more than 11,000 votes and now he's on trial! Even though he never got those votes!

Should have only asked for 10k.

 

[RaceBannon]

And according to H if you take bribes keep it around 40K

 

[Bendintheriver]

Statistically speaking, the odds of harris getting close to a unanimous 10,000 "lost" votes is, almost impossible. Just more of the same. No Republican came from behind to win a race in 2020. Only democrats came from behind to win. This Chicago scam is just more of the same.

 

[EverettChris]

It’s MAGA Country, what do you expect?

 

[HuskyBuck]

Good thing Chicago doesn't have a history of corrupt elections. Otherwise, this might get traction.
On March 19, polling day, Harris was nearly 10,000 votes behind, according to an early estimated tally. By the end of Wednesday, after the 10,000 votes were added in, unofficial results had narrowed down to a tiny margin. O'Neill Burke was ahead by just 1,598 votes, with 50.16 percent of the poll, against 49.84 percent for Harris.

Democrat candidates get 10,000 missing votes after "human error"

I'm assuming you guys have video proof of all these missing votes?

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

Good thing Chicago doesn't have a history of corrupt elections. Otherwise, this might get traction.
On March 19, polling day, Harris was nearly 10,000 votes behind, according to an early estimated tally. By the end of Wednesday, after the 10,000 votes were added in, unofficial results had narrowed down to a tiny margin. O'Neill Burke was ahead by just 1,598 votes, with 50.16 percent of the poll, against 49.84 percent for Harris.

Democrat candidates get 10,000 missing votes after "human error"

I'm assuming you guys have video proof of all these missing votes?

Weird how your standard of evidence shifts all the time.

 

[RaceBannon]

Good thing Chicago doesn't have a history of corrupt elections. Otherwise, this might get traction.
On March 19, polling day, Harris was nearly 10,000 votes behind, according to an early estimated tally. By the end of Wednesday, after the 10,000 votes were added in, unofficial results had narrowed down to a tiny margin. O'Neill Burke was ahead by just 1,598 votes, with 50.16 percent of the poll, against 49.84 percent for Harris.

Democrat candidates get 10,000 missing votes after "human error"

I'm assuming you guys have video proof of all these missing votes?

Well since it's democrats who claimed the votes are missing you must be a dumbass

 

[HuskyBuck]

My point still stands, if there's no video evidence this thread is pointless and we should move on.

 

[RaceBannon]

You don't have a point
Ever

 

[Sledog]

HuskyCuck sucking again. Look up Chicago election history sometim. It's just like 2020 and been going on forever.