Cal too high

C

creepycoug

Well-known poster
This game has all the earmarks of a Crisco debacle, though I recall he didn't struggle with Cal while at Oregon.
I really am not that hyped about Miami yet and have learned to not overly invest w/o a lot more proof, so I don't really care what happens. But I'd be lying if I said I really don't want to lose to Cal. It's just especially embarrassing for some reason. Like, sure, lose to UCLA or someone like that. Just as shitty and sometimes more so than Cal. But there is a certain smell on your clothes after a Cal loss. It is unbearable.
Please Crisco. At least try and run the ball off tackle and tell your QB to tuck the ball away when he runs. And tell him Cal has an all senior D backfield that produces INTs.
Fuck.
 
Cal dominating like the juggernaught program that they are… the ACC can’t help but notice and be afraid ~ very afraid.
 
TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:
Cal dominating like the juggernaught program that they are… the ACC can’t help but notice and be afraid ~ very afraid.
Click to expand...

mendoza-simpsons-mcbain.gif
 
V. Tech got jobbed in favor of Miami and tonight Cal gets jobbed (despite giving up 29 unanswered).
If THAT was not targeting, there is no such thing as targeting. Crown of the helmet, lowered, and driven right into the side of the Cal QB's head.
 
DHD said:
V. Tech got jobbed in favor of Miami and tonight Cal gets jobbed (despite giving up 29 unanswered).
If THAT was not targeting, there is no such thing as targeting. Crown of the helmet, lowered, and driven right into the side of the Cal QB's head.
Click to expand...
shut up you weff whining faggot.
 
I gave out Miami -10 to all my gambling friends. I am so bad at gambling it’s insane

77 total points? Wtf? How did cal score 38 and lose
 
nNQ75B4Q5PKJV.jpg

DHDMember, Swaye's WigwamPosts: 1,466

DA9CQYJ6YUBD.jpg

October 5
V. Tech got jobbed in favor of Miami and tonight Cal gets jobbed (despite giving up 29 unanswered).
If THAT was not targeting, there is no such thing as targeting. Crown of the helmet, lowered, and driven right into the side of the Cal QB's head.
I agree, on top of that the tackler was guilty of launching with the crown of his helmet as the initial point of contact with the obvious result of the Qb's helmet jerking at contact. Booth must not have had that angle ~ TV broadcast was so conclusive as to leave no doubt.
 
Last edited:
TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:
nNQ75B4Q5PKJV.jpg

https://hardcorehusky.com/profile/DHDMember, Swaye's WigwamPosts: 1,466

DA9CQYJ6YUBD.jpg

https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/2004322/#Comment_2004322
V. Tech got jobbed in favor of Miami and tonight Cal gets jobbed (despite giving up 29 unanswered).
If THAT was not targeting, there is no such thing as targeting. Crown of the helmet, lowered, and driven right into the side of the Cal QB's head.
I agree, on top of that the tackler was guilty of launching with the crown of his helmet as the initial point of contact with the obvious result of the Qb's helmet jerking at contact. Booth must not have had that angle ~ TV broadcast was so conclusive as to leave no doubt.
Click to expand...
The last touchdown also had 2 ineligible receivers downfield. Two lineman were blocking in the end zone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top