GrundleStiltzkin
New Fish
That's Erick
BUCK Recruiting
- Thread starter Dennis_DeYoung
- Start date
That's Erick
1to392831weretaken
New Fish
Does this guy have an offer?
Seems to check all the right boxes.
Seems to check all the right boxes.
D
[Deleted User]
Guest
We're not getting a woof.
Last edited:
Tequilla
Active poster
This would be an area that if I had an army of young eager interns at my disposal as part of TSIO Consulting for UW I would look into ... what’s the relative performance of QBs for plays where they are confined to the pocket vs allowed to scramble AND how do those numbers look in particular for mobile QBs like Arizona’s Khalil Tate. I’d want to know what those numbers look like both against UW and the conference as a whole. I’d want to subgroup as well to performance against relatively peer schools as well. And obviously extend that to other conferences.
My hypothesis is that breaking the pocket for a QB leads to substantially more explosive plays (on a rate basis) and lower turnover rates. While sacks are very important in creating negative plays, there is also a risk/reward element to them defensively that needs to be balanced.
My hypothesis is that breaking the pocket for a QB leads to substantially more explosive plays (on a rate basis) and lower turnover rates. While sacks are very important in creating negative plays, there is also a risk/reward element to them defensively that needs to be balanced.
