Arizona Democrat thinks its ok to fight for the Taliban and kill our troops

oregonblitzkrieg

oregonblitzkrieg

New Fish
U.S. Democratic Senate hopeful Kyrsten Sinema[/b] said “I don’t care” if people go and fight for the Taliban in Afghanistan in a newly resurfaced radio interview and co-hosted a radio show with a conspiracy theorist who claimed the September 11, 2001 terror attacks were perpetrated by the government.

During the interview, Sinema told the host that she didn't object to individuals going abroad and fighting for groups hostile to the U.S.
“As an individual, if I want to go fight in the Taliban army, I go over there, and I’m fighting for the Taliban, I’m saying that’s a personal decision,” Hancock told Sinema, who was then a Green Party activist.

“Fine. I don’t care if you go and do that, go ahead,” she replied[/i]

https://foxnews.com/politics/senate-dem-hopeful-kyrsten-sinema-said-i-dont-care-if-people-go-to-fight-for-taliban-against-us?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20foxnews%2Fpolitics%20%28Internal%20-%20Politics%20-%20Text%29
 
Last edited:
1280px-Kyrsten_Sinema_-_Arizona_State_Rep.jpg

They've spent a fortune trying to make her pretty. Above the neck? Eh, there's always Photoshop. Below the neck? Fuck no. She's on the Hillary diet. Get to the gym, fatso.
 
And?
Click to expand...

Treason isn't a voting issue for democrats
Click to expand...

That's treason now?
Click to expand...

Now?

What a dumbfuck
Click to expand...

Section 3.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.

The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.
 
Context:

Later, Sinema and Hancock discussed their political views, with Hancock taking up the libertarian argument against intervention and raising as a hypothetical against Sinema's worldview if she would oppose him joining the Taliban army.
"Now you would say, maybe we do owe something to the world, as long as it's nice and sweet and peaceful and what you want to do," Hancock said to Sinema on his show, "Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock."
"Well it's not so much a candy cane kind of theory as you're making it stand out," Sinema responded. "But I do think that those of us who are privileged to have more do owe something to others."
"By force?" Hancock asked. "By me, as an individual, if I want to go fight in the Taliban army, I go over there and I'm fighting for the Taliban. I'm saying that's a personal decision..."
"Fine," Sinema interjected, "I don't care if you want to do that, go ahead."
Hancock then listed off other hypotheticals, including joining Britain's Royal Air Force in World War II to fight the Germans bombing London, saying he has no problems with what individuals choose to do with their money, as long as its not by government force. Sinema responded by saying, "When you say we owe something to the world, my definition of owing something to the world does not involve war and destruction."
Sinema then said she'd like to get back on topic to her opposition to the Iraq War.
"I don't want to debate any kind of, I don't know, fiscal opportunities with you," Sinema said. "I'm interested in talking about the war. Specifically I'm interested in talking about opposition to the war that's happening tomorrow."
 
And?
Click to expand...

Treason isn't a voting issue for democrats
Click to expand...

That's treason now?
Click to expand...

Now?

What a dumbfuck
Click to expand...

Section 3.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.

The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.
Click to expand...

Looks like you answered your own question.
 
And?
Click to expand...

Treason isn't a voting issue for democrats
Click to expand...

That's treason now?
Click to expand...

Now?

What a dumbfuck
Click to expand...

Section 3.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.

The Congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.
Click to expand...

Looks like you answered your own question.
Click to expand...

I always knew you were smart.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top