Anyone else old enough to remember when some asshole was claiming Tom Cotton...

[SFGbob]

was pushing a right-wing conspiracy theory when he claimed the virus could have come from a Chinese lab?

US officials were reportedly concerned that safety breaches at a Wuhan lab studying coronavirus in bats could cause a pandemic[/i][/b]
https://www.businessinsider.com/us-...bout-safety-issues-in-wuhan-lab-report-2020-4

 

[georgiaduck]

So the lab was flagged for possible safety violations
They were studying coronavirus in animals
Lab located in the city that is the epicenter of the outbreak.

Seems clear to me. You're a racist.

 

[SFGbob]

So the lab was flagged for possible safety violations
They were studying coronavirus in animals
Lab located in the city that is the epicenter of the outbreak.

Seems clear to me. You're a racist.

And a right wing conspiracy theorist, just like that right wing rag the Washington Post.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrap...n-focus-of-coronavirus-outbreak/#5e9c19c81ee1

 

[HHusky]

Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

 

[PurpleThrobber]

Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

Kenny Easley, HELP!!!

 

[PandaOrangeChiknDuck]

Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

It doesn't matter for what purpose, the virus still came from them, and by not following proper procedures, they created a global pandemic. I think you give China two choices: Forgive some foreign debt as compensation for causing the global economic collapse, or economic sanction the fuck out of them.

 

[SFGbob]

Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.

Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.

 

[HHusky]

Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.

Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.

He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.

 

[SFGbob]

Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.

Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.

He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.

Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.

So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."

And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.

 

[HHusky]

Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.

Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.

He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.

Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.

So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."

And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.

Yes. Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab, blob.

I'll leave you to parse the distinction between not eliminating a debunked conspiracy theory from consideration and promoting it.

I'm not saying you're a donkey human hybrid; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities.

 

[SFGbob]

Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.

Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.

He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.

Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.

So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."

And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.

Yes. Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab, blob.

I'll leave you to parse the distinction between not eliminating a debunked conspiracy theory from consideration and promoting it.

I'm not saying you're a donkey human hybrid; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities.

Do you mean like the way "science" said that it couldn't be transmitted from human to human and that it came from a Chinese meat market? Science!!!

Since you're too big a pathological lying piece of shit to quote Cotton here it is.

http://twitter.com/SenTomCotton/sta...ight-lying-about-tom-cottons-covid19-remarks/

Wow, look at the way he "promoted" that theory.

 

[HHusky]

Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.

Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.

He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.

Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.

So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."

And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.

Yes. Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab, blob.

I'll leave you to parse the distinction between not eliminating a debunked conspiracy theory from consideration and promoting it.

I'm not saying you're a donkey human hybrid; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities.

Do you mean like the way "science" said that it couldn't be transmitted from human to human and that it came from a Chinese meat market? Science!!!

Since you're too big a pathological lying piece of shit to quote Cotton here it is.

http://twitter.com/SenTomCotton/sta...ight-lying-about-tom-cottons-covid19-remarks/

Wow, look at the way he "promoted" that theory.

That is a small portion of his Twitter feed and not the most explicit portion.

 

[SFGbob]

Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.

Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.

He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.

Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.

So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."

And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.

Yes. Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab, blob.

I'll leave you to parse the distinction between not eliminating a debunked conspiracy theory from consideration and promoting it.

I'm not saying you're a donkey human hybrid; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities.

Do you mean like the way "science" said that it couldn't be transmitted from human to human and that it came from a Chinese meat market? Science!!!

Since you're too big a pathological lying piece of shit to quote Cotton here it is.

http://twitter.com/SenTomCotton/sta...ight-lying-about-tom-cottons-covid19-remarks/

Wow, look at the way he "promoted" that theory.

That is a small portion of his Twitter feed and not the most explicit portion.

Yes, yes Kunt. The quotes you won't post.

 

[GrundleStiltzkin]

Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.

Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.

He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.

Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.

So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."

And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.

Yes. Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab, blob.

I'll leave you to parse the distinction between not eliminating a debunked conspiracy theory from consideration and promoting it.

I'm not saying you're a donkey human hybrid; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities.

I know you're playing stupid word games with "created" versus "originated." But not ruled out.https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/14/coronavirus-chinese-lab-inconclusive-186408

 

[Sledog]

Why do we fund our enemy? Why are Chinese scientists in our research labs all over the country? Why are we allowing them to steal everything?

Follow the money....

 

[MikeDamone]

It didn’t start in a lab. Everyone says so. 97% or all scientists agree

 

[RaceBannon]

It didn’t start in a lab. Everyone says so. 97% or all scientists agree

Trump said something nice about China in a tweet once

 

[PurpleThrobber]

Seems clear blob craves my attention again.

Studying a virus is different than claiming the virus was created as an potential instrument of war. Smart people grasp the distinction.

Nope, I love exposing you for the lying piece of shit that you are. Weird how you never quote Cotton saying what you keep claiming he said.

Lying Kunts tend to do that a lot.

He has an entire twitter conversation where he engages in saying both (1) he didn't promote the conspiracy theory and (2) that he refuses to rule it out--though science has ruled it out. In short, he's as shady as you are, blob.

Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab? Got a link Kunt? Because the intent for which it might of been created doesn't seem to be something that can be determined by Science.

So you've gone from claiming Cotton "promoted" a "conspiracy theory" that it was a Chinese made bio-weapon to now admitting that he just didn't "rule it out."

And of course, you have no quotes from Cotton.

Yes. Science has ruled out that it was created in a lab, blob.

I'll leave you to parse the distinction between not eliminating a debunked conspiracy theory from consideration and promoting it.

I'm not saying you're a donkey human hybrid; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities.

I'm not saying you have Chinese sperm dribbling off your chin; I'm merely saying it's one of the possibilities.

More like probability but that's venturing into maff turf and we all know how that ends for the Dazzler.

 

[LebamDawg]

the bad news is this kind of stuff throws my 'I bite the head off a bat and the world collapsed' theory

 

[WestlinnDuck]

Best evidence is that it wasn't bioengineered but best evidence is that it did escape from the chicom biolab. The counselor thinks that is just swell and just needs 75k more dead Americans to win some chicom prize money.