All the sites are extremely slanted towards the Southeast but Rivals Florida bias is the absolute worst. It was years ago but at one point they had about a dozen Florida RBs in the top 250
Other than USC do they match Pac10/12 results? I would like to see this broken down.
I know the classes that Stanford won the conference with were ranked 9th 4th 3rd 6th 1st 11th and 2nd in the conference.
UCLA is since 2001 2nd behind USC in rankings and have they have been a bottom half of...
Again go do the research look at the number of staff they have covering the entire West Coast vs just Florida or just Georgia. How on earth could the rankings not be biased? These sites don't get paid to get the rankings right They get paid to produce content for their subscribers who are mostly...
If you pay attention to recruiting rankings thats what you should do. The fans here who look at recruiting rankings are the definition of doog. Hopelessly chasing something that has nothing to do with winning and using it as an excuse.
Recruiting matters, recruiting rankings DO NOT
They positively correlate for teams that recruit Florida, Texas and Georgia. In the last 10-12 years since SEC superiority became a thing USC and Ohio St are the only other teams that have consistent top 10 classes or even top 15 for that matter. And recently Ohio St has been signing 6-12...
Recruiting absolutely matters, recruiting rankings absolutely do not. These websites have twice as many people covering just Florida as they do the entire west coast